With an eye on keeping residential growth manageable, Haverhill city councilors may begin asking a lot more of developers before approving proposals for large projects. “In light of citizen concern about the rapid growth of new residential units in Haverhill, the purpose of this meeting is to address potential changes to our zoning ordinances that may place limits on future residential growth,” said City Councilor John A. Michitson at the start of Tuesday night’s Planning and Development Committee meeting. He is the chair. According to City Solicitor Lisa L. Mead, the Council already has great legal authority to have would-be developers assess and address potential negative impacts. Zoning ordinances say councilors can reject a proposal for broadly defined reasons including, “community needs served by the proposal; traffic and pedestrian flow and safety, including parking and loading; adequacy of utilities and other public services; neighborhood character and social structures; impacts on the natural environment; and potential fiscal impact, including impact on city services, tax base and employment.”
Mead said, “You can require an applicant to show you how they meet that criteria, and that it’s positive for the city, in order to grant the special permit.” Before going before the Council, developers can be asked to study likely impacts, even paying for an independent consultant to verify the results.”
For example, she explained, if a water main feeding a proposed development needs to be replaced, councilors could include the upgrade as a condition of approval.