Mass. State Police Add Dozens of Patrols As Distracted Driving Warnings Begin

Sitting in the audience at Thursday’s press conference, safe driving advocate Jerry Cibley held up a wallet-size photo of his son Jordan, who was killed in a distracted driving crash in 2007. Cibley said he advocated for 13 years for measures contained in the new law. (Photograph Sam Doran/SHNS.)

State Police plan are deploying “dozens of additional patrols” to Massachusetts roadways as a new distracted driving law kicks into effect.

Motorists can expect to see troopers more frequently, particularly during busy commuting times, Massachusetts State Police Col. Christopher Mason said at a Thursday press conference highlighting the imminent implementation of the law that Gov. Charlie Baker signed in November.

Some cruisers will carry two troopers, allowing one to serve as a “spotter” for motorists who do not comply with the new restrictions on virtually all handheld cellphone use behind the wheel.

“Our goal is for you to get home safely to the ones that you care about and the ones that care about you,” Mason said. “Nothing on your screen is worth your life or the life of another.”

Drivers are only be allowed to make a single tap or swipe to activate a device’s hands-free mode, and they must place a phone on a dashboard- or windshield-mounted rack to use it for GPS navigation. Those under 18 cannot use a phone in any capacity while driving.

The new law, speaker after speaker said at Thursday’s press conference, will save lives of drivers, bicyclists and pedestrians.

“There’s simply no question that the evidence on this one is clear,” Baker said. “Distracted driving is a tremendous risk for the drivers, for the passengers in the vehicle, and for anybody who happens to be on the other end of an accident that involves a distracted driver.”

Mason stressed that motorists under the new law are not even permitted to use devices when they are stopped at red lights or stuck in traffic, a practice he said is widespread.

“Just take a ride down the expressway at any rush hour and take a look to your right and take a look to your left if you’re in the middle lane and you’ll see people watching videos, you’ll see people texting, you’ll see people manipulating the phones,” Mason told reporters. “People have a misbelief that, because they’re in stop-and-go traffic, it’s very slow, that they’re still going to be able to react in a timely fashion, which we as the state police, as the people who respond to those crashes, know is not the case.”

While the law officially took effect Sunday, penalties don’t kick in for another five-plus weeks. Police will issue only warnings to drivers through March 31 as they work to increase awareness about the new limits, though the existing ban on typing or reading messages while driving can still draw full punishments.

On April Fools’ Day, authorities will begin issuing fines of $100 for a first violation, $250 for a second violation and $500 for every violation beyond then. Second and subsequent offenses will mandate drivers complete a training program, and third and subsequent offenses are deemed surchargeable, allowing automobile insurers to increase rates.

Distracted driving is a growing problem in Massachusetts, where law enforcement deemed a 2010 ban on texting while driving unenforceable because it did not extend to other device uses such as dialing a phone number.

The state saw 38 crashes involving a distracted driver in 2018, compared to 28 in 2014, according to the Baker administration. During that span, 233 Bay State residents died in crashes involving a distracted driver.

With a 12.8 percent increase from 2015 to 2016, traffic fatalities in Massachusetts grew at more than double the national rate.

Implementation of the new law comes after more than a decade of effort. Some supporters had pushed for a full hands-free use requirement before the existing ban on texting while driving went into effect, but the Legislature’s two branches for years were not on the same page with bills.

Families of distracted-driving crash victims repeatedly petitioned lawmakers to find compromise, upping their push during a months-long stretch last year when the House and Senate both passed individual legislation but could not agree on language intended to monitor for profiling during traffic stops.

Jerry Cibley, whose son, Jordan, was killed in a crash while reaching for his phone, told the News Service that he believes advocates finally gained momentum this session because lawmakers “got tired of seeing us and realized that we were right.”

“We failed and failed and failed and then failed again, and then this year, we finally got some serious support,” Cibley said. “To be able to know that something like this is going to save lives and impact people in a positive way — it’s the best feeling in the world.”

Cibley called distracted driving an “epidemic” that is “getting worse every day.”

Comments are closed.